Photo Library
BRT Data
BRT, NMT, TOD
BRT topics & planning
BRT systems in planning
BRT impact analysis
BRT project risks
BRT project stages
Site visits & training
Guangzhou BRT
Yichang BRT
Transit-Oriented Development
TOD concepts & challenges
Ji'an TOD case study
Good practice case studies
Parking comparative data
Projects
China
Dandong
Fuzhou
Guangzhou
Guiyang
Ji'an
Kaili
Nanning
Xianning
Yichang
Yanji
Others
Indonesia
Bandung
Batam
Makassar
Pekanbaru
Semarang
Others
Johor Bahru
Nairobi
Peshawar
Ulaanbaatar
Yangon
中文
BRT Speed
Cities
Amsterdam
Bangkok
Beijing
Bogota
Brisbane
Cali
Cape Town
Changzhou
Chengdu
Dar es Salaam
Fengxian
Fuzhou
Guangzhou
Guiyang
Hangzhou
Hanoi
Islamabad
Istanbul
Jakarta
Jinan
Johannesburg
Kuala Lumpur
Lanzhou
Leon
Lianyungang
Lima
Los Angeles
Mexico City
Nagoya
Nanchang
Nanning
Nantes
Paris
Pune
Quito
Shanghai
Urumqi
Wenzhou
Wuhan
Xiamen
Yichang
Yinchuan
Zhengzhou
Zhongshan
Photos
Amsterdam
Bangkok
Beijing
Belo Horizonte
Bogota
Brisbane
Cali
Cape Town
Changde
Changzhou
Chengdu
Curitiba
Dalian
Dar es Salaam
Fuzhou
Guangzhou
Guiyang
Hangzhou
Hanoi
Hefei
Islamabad
Istanbul
Jakarta
Jinan
Johannesburg
Kuala Lumpur
Lanzhou
Leon
Lianyungang
Lima
Los Angeles
Mexico City
Nagoya
Nanchang
Nantes
Paris
Pune
Quito
Rio de Janeiro
Shaoxing
Urumqi
Utrecht
Wenzhou
Wuhan
Xiamen
Yancheng
Yichang
Yinchuan
Zaozhuang
Zhengzhou
Zhongshan
Zhoushan
Performance
Peak throughput (passengers / hr / direction)
Peak buses / hr / direction
Full corridor AM peak speed
Full corridor PM peak speed
BRT system coverage (2-way roads) (1 fare)
Operational mode
Routes operating both inside & outside BRT roads
Routes operating only in busway corridors
System passenger-trips per day
Average bus occupancy (peak direction & point)
Highest peak hour boardings at a single station
Highest full-day boardings at a single station
Major prizes
Network of routes and corridors
High peak period operational speed (>20km/hr)
Faster than a trotting donkey (>15km/hr)
Buses operating both in & out of BRT corridors
Most bus passengers in BRT corridors carried by BRT buses
Net time saving for bus passengers in corridor
Throughput >20,000 passengers/hr (one direction)
Throughput >10,000 passengers/hr (one direction)
Carries more than a mixed traffic lane (2500 pphpd)
Infrastructure
Number of BRT stations
Stations with functioning passing lanes
Most station substops
Location of busway lanes
Longest BRT station (non terminal)
Shortest BRT station
Total length of dedicated busway
Length including mixed traffic portions
Station platform width (including walls & doors)
Station platform height
Average distance between stations
Number of corridors
Number of BRT terminals
Number of BRT depots
Segregated busways or bus-only roadways
Enhanced station (more than just a bus shelter)
Overtaking lanes at more than 75% of stations
Bike sharing in vicinity of BRT stations
Wheelchair accessible stations
Distinctive BRT stations
>1 substop at >75% of stations (requires overtaking)
Includes BRT-only tunnels or bridges
>1 stop position at stopping area at >75% of stations
Stations away from intersections
Station size based on passenger demand
Full weather protection on most station platforms
Full weather protection on all station platforms
Covered station access
Escalators/lifts at >20% of stations with bridges/tunnels
Signal priority or grade separation at intersections
Level boarding and alighting
High-quality passenger information at stations
Bicycle parking at BRT stations
Segregated bike lanes along main corridor(s)
Improvements to nearby public space
Physical BRT laneway dividers
Vehicles & ITS
Fleet of special BRT buses
Fleet of regular buses using BRT stations
Fleet of 18m or larger BRT buses
Fleet of integrated BRT feeder buses
Type of fare collection / verification technology
Location of bus doorways
Number of doors in BRT buses
BRT vehicle length
No. of seats in 12m BRT buses
No. of seats in 18m BRT buses
BRT vehicle fuel
BRT bus manufacturer
Fare system vendor
Sliding door system vendor
Surveillance system vendor
Real-time next bus information displays
Distinctive BRT buses
Sliding doors in BRT stations
Low-emission vehicle technology (≥Euro III)
Automated fare collection and fare verification
System control centre
High-quality passenger information on buses
Audio announcements on BRT buses
Real-time CCTV surveillance at all stations
Other
REGULATION AND COSTS
Fare type (flat fare or distance-based)
Median cash fare
Median smart card fare
Infrastructure cost per km
BRT bus operator(s)
12m BRT bus cost
18m BRT bus cost
BRT management agency
Operating hours
Infrastructure financing source
More than one BRT bus operator
Pre-board fare collection and fare verification
Competitively bid operating contracts
Payment per bus-kilometre rather than per passenger
No operational subsidy from government
Buses paid for by operators rather than government
Oversight from an independent entity/agency
BRT authority plans and controls the system
MISCELLANEOUS
BRT Standard score (GOLD, SILVER, BRONZE)
Year system commenced
System name
Lead local design / planning work
Project website
Distinctive marketing identity for system
Net time saving for bus passengers in corridor
Amsterdam
2018
Bangkok
2018
Beijing
Unlikely in corridor 1; not in corridors 2 or 3
2021
Bogota
2016
Brisbane
2017
Cali
2013
Cape Town
2012
Changzhou
2021
Chengdu
2021
Dar es Salaam
Transfer costs, though, are likely high
2017
Fengxian
2021
Fuzhou
2021
Guangzhou
2019
Hangzhou
2021
Islamabad
2015
Istanbul
IETT reports a saving of 52 minutes per passenger per day
2012
Jakarta
2020
Jinan
Likely, in some parts of the corridor
2020
Kuala Lumpur
2019
Lanzhou
2021
Leon
Likely, but not certain, considering transfers
2013
Lianyungang
2020
Lima
2011
Los Angeles
2013
Mexico City
2013
Nagoya
2013
Nanchang
Lane segregation not enforced; no pre-board FC
2019
Nanning
2020
Nantes
2011
Paris
2016
Pune
2015
Quito
2008
Urumqi
Probably not, given the low speeds
2021
Wuhan
2020
Xiamen
2019
Yichang
2021
Yinchuan
Likely, in some parts of the corridor
2021
Zhengzhou
2019
Zhongshan
2018
Creative Commons Attribution License.
You may use for any purpose, but only with attribution / credit to Far East Mobility.